Wednesday, June 30, 2021

Justice Tal ז"ל: A Giant of Justice and Mercy

The Jewish world lost a unique and special individual this week.  Justice Tzvi Tal, of blessed memory, was one of those rare individuals who truly embodied the dictum of the Gemara Yoma 86a:

Abaye said: “And you shall love the Lord your God”  –  you shall make the name of Heaven beloved. How? One should learn Torah and Mishna, serve Torah scholars, and be pleasant with people in one's business transactions. What do people say about such a person? Fortunate is his father who taught him Torah, fortunate is his teacher who taught him Torah, woe to the people who have not studied Torah. See how pleasant are his ways, how proper are his deeds. The verse states about him and others like him: “You are My servant, Israel in whom I will be glorified” (Isaiah 49:3).


Born as Tzvi Elimelech Teitelbaum to a Hassidic family in Poland, Justice Tal came to Eretz Yisrael at a young age. He loved Torah and general knowledge and supported himself through yeshiva high school by working part-time as a mechanic. After attending advanced yeshiva, serving in the Irgun and then the army (he fought in three wars), he went to law school and became a respected attorney. After some years he was asked to become a judge on the Jerusalem District Court. He considered that to be a judge in a non-Torah legal system may well be problematic, and spoke to several Rabbonim about it. The Lubavitcher Rebbe among others encouraged him to be a judge, but at the same time to increase his dedication to Torah by teaching a daily shiur. He considered a judge as doing God's work if done properly. Eventually, he rose to the pinnacle of the Israeli legal world, serving as the conscience of the Israeli Supreme Court as he occupied the “religious seat” for years. (He was often not happy about that; he felt sometimes as a fig leaf for many of the excesses of Aharon Barak’s aggressive Court). 

In his career as a judge, he sat on many important cases, and found himself often in the minority, especially when arguing for the more traditional position. The most famous judicial panel that he sat on was the trial of John Demjanjuk שר"י , who may or may not have been “Ivan the Terrible”, but certainly was, at minimum, an accessory to 28,000 murders at Sobibor. 

The judge was best known for heading the eponymous commission that came up with the “Tal Law”; a compromise that he enabled by meeting Roshei Yeshiva with the utmost respect, fashioning an arrangement that reasonable people on both sides could live with. As he put it, “Take away the Torah, and what will be left of us? A small, and unimportant people with a sub-American culture. We are on the stage of history only thanks to the Torah, the Mishnah, the Talmud - the great contribution of the Jewish people. Not only religiously but also nationally. This is the core of our identity. But only some are engaged in Torah as their full occupation, many others just hang out in Yeshivot. Those must go to the army or serve the public like everyone else. " Although it was later overturned, the Yeshiva world remained grateful to him for doing what he could to protect serious Torah scholars.

One must arrive at the correct legal decision. But one must never forget to also arrive at Tzedek – the fair and ethical truth.  One must use not only Midat HaDin but also Midat HaRachamim (not only justice but mercy).  L’fnim MShurat Hadin.

I knew him, however, in a different light. Growing up in Bayit Vegan and visiting my parents' home frequently, I would see Justice Tal very often at the Sochatchov shtibel where he attended shiurim, gave a daily Mishnayos shiur, and was the best Ba'al Keri'ah that I have ever heard. He radiated a quiet dignity and wisdom, and was a walking Kiddush Hashem for his excellence in Torah and Derech Eretz, as he commanded universal respect for his deep integrity and fearlessness.

However, as is too often the case, I learned much more about him in the news stories that appeared after his passing, and my appreciation has grown exponentially. I saw an interview in which he shared how difficult he found it to send anyone to jail. It reminded me of a Gemara that I learned this week (Bava Metzia 30b) in which Rav Yochanan taught that the reason Jerusalem was destroyed was because they judged according to Torah Law. This obviously strange statement was explained by the Gemara to mean that they judged by the strict letter of the law and did not engage in L’fnim MShurat Hadin (Going beyond strict justice.) As Justice Tal said, "Of course one must arrive at the correct legal decision. But one must never forget to also arrive at Tzedek – the fair and ethical truth.  One must use not only Midat HaDin but also Midat HaRachamim (not only justice but mercy).  L’fnim MShurat Hadin.

When sentencing even those whose guilt was beyond doubt, his hand would shake while signing the sentencing decree; he would ask their forgiveness for having to do this. A convict whom he sent to prison for fifteen years, published a message expressing his heartbreak at the judge’s passing. The judge would make a point of visiting him at least once a year to inquire after his welfare. In fact, he did this for all those whom he sentenced to a long term, even those who would not forgive him nor shake his hand when he came to see them. On one occasion, this prisoner asked the judge to help watch over his helpless wife and young children, which the judge did for many years. Another ex-con related “the judge changed my life. Today I earn an honest living and am a grandfather. Every few months I called the judge at his request to let him know how I am doing. While I was still incarcerated, my son had a Bar mitzvah – the judge arranged and paid for everything, and refused to let me acknowledge him as he sat unobtrusively at a side table . . . can you believe such a man existed?

His son related that he fasted on the day that he sentenced Demjanjuk to death (later overturned by the Supreme Court). “Do you know what an awesome responsibility it is to take another life, even a monster like Demjanjuk? One cannot just sit down to a breakfast of scrambled eggs and then send a man to death . . . “ His son – who saw him cry many times when reading Eicha – wondered how he could not cry when listening to the survivors talk about their horrible experiences. “It took enormous self-control, but I have a job to do and I have to keep my personal feelings to myself.”

He maintained his integrity and was universally respected by all – Secular, Dati Leumi, and Chareidi alike. One story related to his regular attendance at the Daf Yomi in the shtibel, where the regulars would be unlikely to stand in silence for the siren on Yom HaZikaron, especially if it was sounded during a shiur. He, of course, not only had the highest respect for the fallen soldiers in general; he had given the ultimate sacrifice of his son Moshe הי"ד in a battle during the Yom Kippur war. He told a friend that to not attend the shiur was unthinkable. But a few minutes before the siren, he went out as if he had to take care of some matter, stood at attention during the siren thinking of Moshe and his comrades, and then went back to his Gemara. Without fanfare or arguments, he knew how to do the right thing resolutely with quiet integrity.

One of my great regrets is that I never really had a conversation with him although I often wished him Good Shabbos. I was simply too much in awe and did not know what to say that did not sound small and insignificant. I will greatly miss seeing this giant small man, who embodied everything a great Torah Im Derech Eretz Jew should be.

Woe to us for those who are no longer, and there is none like one them to replace them.
חבל דאבדין ולא משתכחין

Published in the Jewish Press July 2, 2021



Sunday, June 6, 2021

A Government Not for the Sake of Heaven

Ah, Politics.  The national pastime of Israel – everyone has an opinion; a nation of prime ministers as the old Golda Meir line goes.  After four elections in the past two years, one would think we are inured to really worrying about the outcome, or lack thereof.  But this time around, an earthquake is happening, and it is deeply worrying.

In this week’s Parshat Hashavua, we read about the sorry tale of Korach.  The Mishna in Pirkei Avot (5:17) famously offers the arguments between Hillel and Shammai as a prototype of an “Argument for the Sake of Heaven”, while the protagonists of an “Argument Not for the Sake of Heaven” are Korach and his conspirators.  A question asked by many is why does the Mishna cite “Korach and his conspirators”?  Surely, the negative parallel case to Hillel and Shammai ought to have been Korach and Moshe! 

A famous answer given by the Malbim is that a sine qua non of an “Argument for the Sake of Heaven” is that each side represents a unified view of truth, unified on an important principle.  In the case of Korach, however, we find that he brought together a motley crew of different people with disparate interests.  Korach wanted to be the Kohen Gadol.  The 250 who joined were disgruntled bechoros who were enraged that they were supplanted by the tribe of Levi. Dassan and Aviram were long-time antagonists of Moshe. On be Peles – it isn’t clear what he wanted.  The only thing that bound them together was a determination to attack the authority of Moshe and affect a change of leadership.  As Rabbi Dr Jonathan Sacks zt”l put it, “The groups had nothing in common except that they each wanted to be leaders. Each of them wanted a more important or respected position than they currently held. In a word, they wanted power. This was an argument not for the sake of heaven.”




The parallels to the proposed “unity government” that – barring a miracle -- will be sworn in could not be clearer. The group is made up of those whose views and agenda represent the farthest left – Meretz and Labor—those that claim to be on the right – Yamina, New Hope, Yisrael Beiteinu – and those in the Center – Yesh Atid, Blue and White.  As with Korach, they are united by one thing, and one thing only – hatred, jealousy, and animus towards one of the greatest Prime Ministers in the history of the State of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu.

The price of joining together? They are proposing to 

Remove corrupt politicians from power, by installing the corrupt Liberman as Finance Minister

Do away with the “blackmail” of the Haredim and instead grant more than 50 Billion Shekels to the Arabs

Reject the “homophobe” Ben Gvir , while agreeing to the Arab demand to stop the advancement of the LBTQ agenda

Stand for the principles of Democracy while installing a Prime Minister whose party has only six seats; seats that he won by explicitly promising that he would not join such a government.

Stand for the principle of Law and Order while agreeing in advance to legitimize tens of thousands of homes built illegally by the Arabs.

Central to making this work, is the inclusion of the Ra’am party, headed by Mansour Abbas.  This is a particularly difficult pill to swallow.  To be honest, two months ago, when there was a discussion of how Netanyahu might succeed in forming a coalition, I was amongst those on the right who were in favor of having the support of Abbas.  Living in Israel, especially in the Galilee, I have worked with, been treated and served by and interacted and even become friendly with many Arabs.  Particularly in the course I took to become a tour guide, I found that there are many Arabs (Muslim and Christian) who are good people, interested in living with Israel in peace, and who do not support the efforts of the Arab terrorists to harm us.  It seemed to me that what I was hearing from Mansour Abbas, as opposed to Ahmed Tibi and other awful Arab leaders, represented these moderate Arabs. He seemed interested only in promoting the civil rights, education, and welfare of peaceful Arabs, and it was good to have their support if that is it what it took to form a right-wing government.  When Smotrich and Ben Gvir (whom I am proud to have voted for) warned that they could not be trusted, I questioned this stance.

And then came the recent mini-war.  And the terrible pogroms that took place in Lod, Acco, and other mixed cities, coupled with terrible lynches in Jerusalem and elsewhere.  As a seasoned politician, Abbas said the politically correct things to the western press. He even came to visit the site of the shul torched during the pogrom in Lod.  But to his Arab audience, he supported those who fought in the streets and refused to discuss the security issues until the fighting stopped.  He praised the hooligans who fought in the streets as the best of our young people. And I understood and appreciated the position of Smotrich and Ben Gvir –until and unless Abbas publicly disassociates himself from his previously stated positions in favor of terrorists and Jihad, and demonstrated true loyalty to the Jewish state, he cannot be relied on to be part of the government.

This “Korach problem”, of banding together to silence others and destroy their leadership, is of course not limited to Israel (i.e. the banding together of so many disparate parties to destroy President Trump), nor is it limited to the world of politics. Again to quote Rabbi Sacks, “I believe that what is happening at universities, turning the pursuit of truth into the pursuit of power, silencing, demonizing and no-platforming those with whom people disagree, is the Korach phenomenon of our time, and it is very dangerous indeed. An old Latin motto says that to secure justice, audi alteram artem, 'Listen to the other side.' It is through listening to the other side that we walk the path to truth."

In a few weeks we will once again be experiencing Tisha B’Av, and reflecting on the famous story of Kamtza and Bar Kamtza. A famous question is often asked: why does the Gemara blame Kamtza for what happened?  After all, the bad actors were Bar Kamtza and the anonymous host, not Kamtza, who does not appear at all in the story!  The Maharal explains that the Churban happened because of the insane hatred that Kamtza shared with the host against Bar Kamtza, to the point that they were unwilling to associate with Bar Kamtza, no matter the cost.  Similar to Korach, these were two people united only because of a common enemy, and thus Kamtza shares the blame as well.

Let us hope that by the time Tisha B’Av comes around, the powers that be in Israel come to their senses and – unlike Korach and Kamtza – will be willing to get past their personal animus before a far greater tragedy unfolds.