Indeed, there is a great middle ground
of serious people who are now referred to as “Chareidi”, who feel
repelled by many of the statements and actions of Chareidim spokesmen
and activists, and wish they were not associated with these
statements and actions in the court of public opinion. Put another
way, while others may express themselves as they wish, and take
responsibility for their own bringing honor to Hashem and His Torah
(or Heaven forfend the reverse), we should not be implicitly or
explicitly blamed or implicated for those actions by our association.
In particular, I
was very gratified to a receive a positive response to the article
from one of our most distinguished Queens Rabbonim, Rabbi Fabian
Schonfeld שליט"א.
He noted among other things that one great Rav who we both hold in
great admiration, namely Rav Samson Raphael Hirsch זצ"ל,
went to great lengths to avoid labels such as Chareidi-Judaism, or
Modern-Orthodox, preferring to refer only to “Torah True”
Judaism.1
This of course, as it should be. One ought to feel comfortable, as
I did today, davening in the Satmar Beis Hamidrash in Williamsburg in
the morning, proceeding from there to Yeshiva University to attend a
seminar with Rabbonim of various hashkafot, and then finishing the
day at our Young Israel at a Yom Hashoah commemoration with Jews of
an even greater variety of observance and outlook. We ought to be
able to look at ourselves as comprising only one large group, that of
Torah true Jews.
Nevertheless, the
reality is that there are many serious Hashkafic differences between
Jews, and although we are all bound by the same Halacha, there are
significant differences in many matters that affect our approach to
life. In broad strokes, there are Ashkenazim and Sephardim and Eidot
HaMizrach; Chassidim as opposed to Misnagdim; those looking to
embrace all that is good in the secular world and those who are
looking to stay away from anything in the secular world that isn't
absolutely necessary; those who see Zionism and the State of Israel
as a great blessing and those who see it as a cause of much turning
away from Torah; and everything in between. This is nothing new.
Moreover, many of
the great commentaries point to the division of Israel into twelve
tribes as being not only of genealogical interest, but as indicative
of different paths to Avodas Hashem, each of them equally co-valid
and complementary, wherein different people could find their own way
in the service of Hashem that speaks to the needs of their own
Neshamos. We know something of the differing paths of Yissachar and
Zevulun, or Yosef and Yehuda, and certainly that of Levi, somewhat
less of the other tribes, but the message is clear: it is only by
recognizing and validating that there are different people with
different sensitivities, talents, thought patterns, resources,
abilities, and spiritual needs that we come together as a great
diversified nation united by Halacha and loyalty to Hashem. In our
time, it is up to individuals to fulfill the dictum of Pirkei Avos
עשה לך רב –
Establish a Rabbinic Guide
for Yourself – in order to find the spiritual path that matches
their neshama, within the Halachic world.
Given that this is the case, and that
for both the purposes of self identification and for that of our
children's education, we feel the need to belong to a particular
group within “Torah-True Judaism”, it is necessary that the
groups be drawn neither too narrowly nor too broadly. On the one
hand the group needs to be broad enough to contain many shades of
variety and diversity, or else the dangers of insularity, group-think
and defensiveness will create people who are devoid of the ability
and need to appreciate and understand others, and will stifle
originality, creativity and growth among its members. On the other
hand the group needs not to be drawn so broadly so that it includes
extremes so far beyond the pale of the beliefs and views of the more
moderate members that they are appalled to be associated with those
positions. It is to that phenomenon that my last article spoke.
I wish to add that this phenomenon is
not limited to the Chareidi,or so-called “Ultra-Orthodox”, world.
(I used to object to the pejorative nature of the term
“Ultra-Orthodox”, given that the dictionary defines the word
“ultra” as “going
beyond due limit”, and offers helpful synonyms such as “extremist,
fanatic, rabid, radical” etc. More recently I have begun to
question my objection . . . ) A similar issue is very present in
the Modern-Orthodox world as well. As a recently term-limited-out
member of the Executive committee of the RCA (Rabbinical Council of
America),2
I had a front row seat to many of the struggles that go on within
Modern Orthodoxy. On the one hand, there are those who are seeking
to push innovations such as: female Rabbis, prayer groups for women
including Kaddish and Krias HaTorah, or of “partnership minyanim”;
acceptance of homosexual couples as full members of the community
including having a mazal tov kiddush when they adopt a child; pushing
lower standards for conversions; no longer saying the blessing of
“Shelo Asani Isha” as offensive to women (and perhaps even
omitting “Shelo Asani Goy” as politically incorrect); and, more
broadly, introducing secular, academic, and non-traditional sources
when considering Halachic p'sak (decision making). On the other
hand, there are those who strongly resist and resent those efforts
(and many somewhere in between). It is a struggle, as well, between
those who look to Gedolim such as Rav Aharon Lichtenstein, Rav
Hershel Schachter, Rav Mordechai Willig, and Rav Gedaliah Dov
Schwartz (all שליט"א
)
as the standard bearers of the Mesorah in our time; and those on the
far left, particularly those associated with Rabbi Avi Weiss and
Yeshiva Chovevei Torah who have a very different vision of of what
the future ought to be considered within the pale of Modern
Orthodoxy.
I
have friends and colleagues who have the same angst at being known as
Modern Orthodox as I do at being known as Chareidi, if Modern
Orthodoxy includes the extreme innovations of those on the left.
They, too, suffer uncalled-for criticism, that makes them cringe. I
remember attending an Agudah convention some years back, when one of
the Roshei Yeshiva attacked “Centrist Judaism”, the term then in
vogue for Modern Orthodoxy. Citing some of the excesses of some of
the more left wing Rabbis he thundered “If that is centrist, than
what is to the left of them, Conservative Judaism??” How shameful
it must have felt for serious Talmidei Chachamim and Yirei Shamayim
within the Modern Orthodox world to be pronounced one step removed
from Conservative Judaism! That is the danger when a publicly
identified group is too large – the inevitable extremists taint the
mainstream and traditional members with their excesses.
I
do not know what the answer is to all this is, other than for a
re-emergence of a true Centrist Judaism group, one that is broad
based and comprised of “Torah-True Jews”, that will not tolerate
either the extremists of the right or the left in speaking for them
or setting the agenda for the Klal. One whose leaders will be
serious Talmidei Chachamim, who represent of a true diversity of
Hashkafot and styles, while possessing mutual respect and dignity for
each other and in speaking to those both within the community and
without in ways of pleasantness and inspiration. With apologies:
“perhaps I am a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.”
1The
famous dispute between Rav Hirsch & the Wurzburger Rav is very
germane to this, but space does not permit comment
2 I
note that the RCA is a broad based organization of predominantly
Modern Orthodox Rabbis of a variety of Hashkafot, and some who have a more Chareidi outlook. The RCA does not presently
offer membership to candidates with semicha from YCT .
No comments:
Post a Comment